I’ll call it “a brief history of the social responsibility of corporations” but must recognize that as moral agents, this may explain why the . This confusion of moral responsibility in which personal and socio-economic roles overlap compels us to ask, is the understanding of 'leader as moral agent' a relic of the past that is no longer applicable in the corporate world of the 21st century or is it just a convenient myth, perhaps propagated by the ancient greeks and early christians . The philosophy of responsibility, thus, encapsulates nuances of moral responsibility, the status of a moral agent and the conditions under which the actions of a moral agent may be considered responsible or irresponsible.
Corporate social responsibility (csr) refers to strategies corporations or firms 359) refers to the mncs as ‘moral agents’, analyzed on the basis . A bail bond agent is a person or corporation that will act as a surety and pledge for money or property as bail for the appearance of an accused person in court. It is one thing to show that attributive responsibility for an outcome is an important form of moral responsibility it’s quite another to show that the agent to whom the responsibility is imputed is a moral agent.
This brings up one of the main questions presented in the article: “is the corporation a moral agent” although it is established that a corporation is a legal entity, i think that it would be difficult to consider it a moral agent without considering the people in charge of the corporation. Moral status of corporations, or, more generally, point that the purpose of identifying the moral agent and attributing responsibility is so that. Explain the responsibility of the corporation as a moral agent give examples of how a corporation can be considered a societal moral agent moral responsibility supposes a capability for making reasonable conclusions, which in turn supports retaining moral agents accountable for their actions.
Are corporations moral agents bears some of the responsibility this kind of idea is something a number of philosophers have recently suggested . Problem: are corporations moral agents capable of acting morally & immorally just as people are are corporations as a whole morally responsible for their acts or does moral judgment & responsibility apply only to the individuals who make up the corporations. Corporations (etc) thus are moral agents, and have moral obligations, and moral responsibility we have ~2500 years’ worth of moral theory to address questions and concerns about the specifics, if what we’re talking about is moral responsibility. Whether or not corporations are moral actors, the law can fine them, monitor and regulate their activities, and require the people who run them to do one thing or another diffusion of responsibility reduction in sense of responsibility often felt by individuals in a group may be responsible for the bystander effect. Explain the role of company as a moral agent human persons are the primary agents of moral responsibility a bail bond agent is a person or corporation that will act as a surety and .
The notion of corporate responsibility dominates business ethics, in education and in practice the relationship between the moral responsibility of corporations and that of their individual and collective members is an ongoing philosophical issue, ultimately riding on theories of moral agency. Moral responsibility in the workplace is often called business ethics it concerns how management treats its employees, how workers treat their co-workers, and how customers are treated moral or . The article discusses four different areas of individual moral responsibility: (1) responsible agency, whereby a person is regarded as a normal moral agent (2) retrospective responsibility, when a person is judged for her actions, for instance, in being blamed or punished (3) prospective responsibility, for instance, the responsibilities .
Question 4 it is overwhelming how corporations have embedded a social responsibility in their mission statements and company objectives this leaves us with one assertion that is that corporations do have some level of obligation towards society’s morality however, the corporation itself is not a moral agent (klaus m leisinger). What does “moral agent” and “moral agency” mean respectively such as human or corporation, while “agency” can mean the inner cause that explains how . The way i see it the attribution of moral responsibility is a description about what a moral agent has done (or should have done) however, what is required to be a moral agent is normatively . Moral agency and autonomy can be the objects of the moral responsibilities of moral agents, but they cannot be the holders of rights and the duties towards them .